With big thanks to MIT Press and a terrific group of colleagues, I’m delighted to report that the iPad app version of my new book, Intellectual Property Strategy, is now approved and available in the App Store. (To find it, click here or search on “Intellectual Property Strategy” within the App Store on your iPad.)
The book is now available in multiple formats, several of which are conventional and one of which is experimental. First, Intellectual Property Strategy is available as an ordinary, printed text which can be read without a computing device or electricity. I would guess that this traditional form of the book may well be the primary way that most readers will interact with it. The printed book is a wonderful technology, which still works extremely well for most people in most instances. Second, the book can be read in its Kindle edition, which is little more — at this stage — than a digital form of the printed book. (As an aside: I’ve been having a great time reading on the Kindle app on my iPad and then sharing little phrases on Twitter, Facebook, and Amazon.com. These social features are a lot of fun — and represent the best Kindle development to date, in my view.) Third, on the MIT Press web page for the book, a reader can find a few chapters freely available plus additional resources, which can be accessed for free. These additional resources take the form of a series of in-depth case studies and videos of Intellectual Property experts, who comment on issues that I address in the book. There is nothing all that experimental about these first three versions of the book.
The iPad app is the experimental form. When I was about half-way through the book-writing process (with help from my great editor Marguerite Avery and library colleague June Casey), 21-year-old Cody Brown published a post in TechCrunch. “Dear Authors,” Cody began, by way of the title, “your next book should be an app, not an iBook.” I’d had a similar thought: what if we thought about this book as an application, rather than a traditional book. What could be different? Around this same time, I also bought NONOBJECT, another iPad app published by MIT Press, and it got me thinking about the possibilities.
Well, a fair amount is different. In the iPad app version, a reader can use a series of cool navigation features that Aaron Zinman, the creative app developer who built it, dreamed up and coded into the app. The book has many more links than a first-generation iBook/eBook. The links take you to three types of places: 1) within the book itself, to the glossary and back, for instance; 2) with the extended-play version of the book, such as the case studies, which don’t appear in the printed book; and 3) out to the open web, where I link out to web sites and other resources. If a reader follows a link out to the open web, then they are free to keep going, much as a web surfer would. I hope they’d return to my primary text, but even if they don’t, this is a risk worth running, in my view.
What’s most “different” about the iPad app version of the book is that it has embedded in it a series of videos. I interviewed a group of scholars who know a great deal about IP — much more than me, in the aggregate, and individually, too — and recorded the interviews on video. With the help of colleagues, I’ve included snippets of these videos into the text of the book. That way, a reader can hear from scholars other than me about the issues I’m taking up in the text as they are reading through it. These video snippets can also lead the reader to the longer forms of the interviews, as long as 30 minutes, if they’d like.
Back to Cody Brown’s TechCrunch piece. This iPad app takes the book form from A -> C, not A -> M, much less A -> Z. There’s much more that one could do, with non-linear pathways through the text, the gamelike qualities that Cody suggests, the ability to edit the primary text. These are still possible, left on the table for another experiment. I look forward to working on some of these next-stage experiments in future projects.
A special note to libraries, and especially those interested in digital preservation: this iPad app version of the book leads to a curious question about preservation. Libraries are great at preserving the physical forms of books. Libraries are beginning to get smart about preserving simple digital formats — flat html files, for instance, and audio and video files. But an iPad app? In its integrated form, the iPad app is a tricky thing to preserve, I’d guess. If Cody Brown’s challenge (and other similar thinking) leads to more experimentation, our preservation activities will have to get creative very quickly or we will lose the record of these early efforts. Puts me in mind of the challenge to librarians posed by Nicholson Baker in his controversial book, Doublefold, along similar lines — only more than a decade ago. How might we, as libraries, partner with Apple, for instance, to ensure that there’s a preservation process for these books? Or with Internet Archive, which has done such an amazing job with the open web itself?
Also: I call this post “Book Experiment #1,” not because others haven’t experimented already in much more profound ways, but only because I’ve planned out two more posts to come — Book Experiments #2 and #3, to come shortly on this blog.